لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it ideal for the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified because of the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Statutory laws are Those people created by legislative bodies, which include Congress at both the federal and state levels. Though this variety of regulation strives to shape our society, supplying rules and guidelines, it would be extremely hard for almost any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced into the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or the finding and mold the relief to make it acceptable towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or even the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision from the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
be set up without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is a horrifying reality, an extremely low threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 of the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm to the person causes death of these types of person, both by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is said to commit qatl-i-khata.”
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it necessitates legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Although several websites offer free case regulation, not all are equally reliable. It’s important to evaluate the credibility with the source before depending on the information.
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only completed if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded towards the allegations as a result they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
PACER allows everyone with an account to search and Identify appellate, district, and bankruptcy court case and here docket information. Register for a PACER account.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is well established now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar towards the civil servant service framework however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it truly is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may possibly if pleased that a civil servant who was entitled to be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his individual, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province inside the higher post, direct that this sort of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay out and allowances of this kind of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Stacy, a tenant within a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not specified her plenty of notice before raising her rent, citing a different state regulation that needs a minimum of 90 times’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new legislation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.